<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparison of Search Share, September and October 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/search-share-comparison-sept-oct-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/search-share-comparison-sept-oct-2009/</link>
	<description>Peltier Tech Excel Charts and Programming Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:37:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: How Succinctly Can I Explain Why Pie Charts Are Evil? &#124; Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/search-share-comparison-sept-oct-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23252</link>
		<dc:creator>How Succinctly Can I Explain Why Pie Charts Are Evil? &#124; Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=2666#comment-23252</guid>
		<description>[...] catching up on some blog reading yesterday morning and seeing an excellent example of pie chart alternatives from Jon Peltier, and then watching seven presentations yesterday, six of which used the same basic presentation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] catching up on some blog reading yesterday morning and seeing an excellent example of pie chart alternatives from Jon Peltier, and then watching seven presentations yesterday, six of which used the same basic presentation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Ferrero</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/search-share-comparison-sept-oct-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23147</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Ferrero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=2666#comment-23147</guid>
		<description>The numbers could also mean that Google and Bing users are clicking the search button more often because they can&#039;t find what they want the first time.

Whereas Yahoo users...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers could also mean that Google and Bing users are clicking the search button more often because they can&#8217;t find what they want the first time.</p>
<p>Whereas Yahoo users&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/search-share-comparison-sept-oct-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23142</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=2666#comment-23142</guid>
		<description>So as search volume increases, Google&#039;s and Bing&#039;s shares increase. So people who are making more and more searches (are they more savvy?) are using Google and Bing. The people who are not increasing their searches are using Yahoo and (he-he) AOL. Or am I making too many assumptions.

I would have tried this panel chart as a line chart as well. No need to mess with shades of colors....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So as search volume increases, Google&#8217;s and Bing&#8217;s shares increase. So people who are making more and more searches (are they more savvy?) are using Google and Bing. The people who are not increasing their searches are using Yahoo and (he-he) AOL. Or am I making too many assumptions.</p>
<p>I would have tried this panel chart as a line chart as well. No need to mess with shades of colors&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Ferrero</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/search-share-comparison-sept-oct-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23135</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Ferrero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=2666#comment-23135</guid>
		<description>So, we are into analysis now. For the year to date data I would show the cumulative change in percent share from a reference date. In the chart below, I have picked Dec 08 as the reference date, so I am showing the change in share in Jan, Feb, etc.

&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://peltiertech.com/images/2009-11/chart002.png&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

As it is the colours do not add anything to the chart, except maybe some confusion. I could have changed the colours from Excel&#039;s defaults, but I am too lazy. Perhaps I will write some code to do this easily - Excel 07s nasty GUI makes it too tedious.

As Mike points out, the size of the search market has also grown during the period (Oct 09 total searches are 18.5% greater than Dec 08). We should probably show this on a separate chart to give a true picture. Again, I am lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, we are into analysis now. For the year to date data I would show the cumulative change in percent share from a reference date. In the chart below, I have picked Dec 08 as the reference date, so I am showing the change in share in Jan, Feb, etc.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://peltiertech.com/images/2009-11/chart002.png"/></p>
<p>As it is the colours do not add anything to the chart, except maybe some confusion. I could have changed the colours from Excel&#8217;s defaults, but I am too lazy. Perhaps I will write some code to do this easily &#8211; Excel 07s nasty GUI makes it too tedious.</p>
<p>As Mike points out, the size of the search market has also grown during the period (Oct 09 total searches are 18.5% greater than Dec 08). We should probably show this on a separate chart to give a true picture. Again, I am lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/search-share-comparison-sept-oct-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23093</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=2666#comment-23093</guid>
		<description>Mike -

Thanks for providing the data for the whole year.

&lt;p align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://peltiertech.com/images/2009-11/search_pie_oct08-oct09.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

In fact, shortening the time axis helps show the trends more clearly:

&lt;p align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://peltiertech.com/images/2009-11/search_pie_o08-o09.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike -</p>
<p>Thanks for providing the data for the whole year.</p>
<p align=center><img src="http://peltiertech.com/images/2009-11/search_pie_oct08-oct09.png" /></p>
<p>In fact, shortening the time axis helps show the trends more clearly:</p>
<p align=center><img src="http://peltiertech.com/images/2009-11/search_pie_o08-o09.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/search-share-comparison-sept-oct-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23092</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=2666#comment-23092</guid>
		<description>Ed, Mike -

Thanks for the two good points you&#039;ve raised: what&#039;s the expected (or typical) variability, and how do we present this variability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, Mike -</p>
<p>Thanks for the two good points you&#8217;ve raised: what&#8217;s the expected (or typical) variability, and how do we present this variability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

