PTS Blog

Custom Solutions | Commercial Utilities | Training | Charts and Tutorials | PTS Blog

 

Main menu:

 
Peltier Tech
Chart Utilities

PTS Waterfall Chart Utility
PTS Cluster-Stack Column Chart Utility
PTS Box and Whisker Chart Utility
PTS Marimekko Chart Utility
PTS Dot Plot Utility
PTS Cascade Chart Utility

Subscribe

Site search

Subscribe

Site search


Recent Posts

Recently Commented

Popular Posts

Archive


 

Categories


 

Buy me a coffee

If this topic or the whole blog has been helpful, support further development by treating me to a cup of coffee.


Privacy Policy

Creative Commons License
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

Paper Pie Charts?

by Jon Peltier
Peltier Technical Services, Inc., Copyright © 2009.
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

In Paper-Based Pie Chart Graphs, the information aesthetics blog shows a pie chart that isn’t printed on paper, but is actually fabricated out of paper. It came from Paper Graphs, on Nicholas O’Leary’s knolleary blog. This seems to be more a work of art than a chart, so maybe it’s okay.

But I get the idea that information aesthetics is taking this rather seriously as a useful way to display data. A 2D chart is ineffective enough for conveying informtion, and a pseudo 3D chart on a flat display (or a printed page) exaggerates the ineffectiveness. This sculpture can only be worse.

So information aesthetics is hosting a contest to find the best information display based on, but not printed on, paper. They chose this picture the headline the post announcing the contest.

My thoughts exactly. Or maybe…

Possibly Related Posts:

Bookmark and share this entry:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Learn how to create Excel dashboards.

Comments


Comment from Glen Turpin
Time: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 9:20 am

Jon, I respectfully disagree that the contest is about “useful” ways to display data at all. The criteria are beauty and originality versus readability and usability.

The Information Aesthetics blog focuses on visualizations that present data or information in original, intriguing or artistic ways. I don’t think it’s about the most effective ways to understand data. It’s always seemed more like a romp through beautiful and unexpected visualizations, using data as the raw material of the design or artistic process.

Take this, for example: http://infosthetics.com/archives/2009/01/tidal_data_as_a_table_data_furniture.html. As an informational chart, it’s useless. (As furniture, it doesn’t look very practical either.) But it’s a thing of beauty nonetheless.

I don’t know Andrew, but I’ve been an Information Aesthetics reader for quite some time. He’s not looking for useful analytical tools. He’s encouraging people to have fun and be creative.

I can’t wait to see the results, even if they are useless.


Comment from Jon Peltier
Time: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 9:23 am

Glen – I agree that Information Aesthetics has some artistic content. Somehow the word Information seems misplaced.


Comment from Chandoo
Time: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 7:03 pm

Haha.. Jon, when I saw the post in information aesthetics.. I was like.. paper pie charts, really!!?!. Then I saw their contest post. I guess as Glen pointed they wanted to make it more of art and creativity contest than focus on information.

Also, to be frank, I dont think the original paper pie is effective, it provides poor contrast, although you can touch and grope (in authors words) to find exact values.


Comment from Jon Peltier
Time: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 10:26 pm

“…you can touch and grope to find exact values.”

Not a very accurate instrument, the human hand. I was talking with my next door neighbor, whose wife is 39-1/2 weeks pregnant. She went into labor last week, a bit premature, and the contractions weren’t that close or that regular yet, but I gather she was not too comfortable. Anyway, the doctors kept her there for a while, then sent her home. My neighbor says it was frustrating, because they’d hear three OBs in a row, 3 cm dilated, 8 cm, 5 cm; 80% effaced, 25%, 50%. I mean, these are not precision machined calipers, these are fingers.

So I doubt feeling around on the corrugated surfaces will give you any better “feel” for the numbers than a quick glance would.


Comment from comptonator
Time: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 1:48 pm

Your post is very timely. I just finished Edward Tufte’s chapter on chartjunk and moire effects yesterday. This is a great illustration of an emphasis on gridlines instead of data. They still get points for an interesting perspective.

Write a comment

I welcome comments from my readers. If you have an opinion on this post, if you have a question or if there is anything to add, I want to hear from you. Whether you agree or disagree, please join the discussion.

If you want to include an image in your comment, post it on your own site or on one of the many free image sharing sites, and include a link in your comment. I'll download your image and insert the necessary html to display the image inline.

Read the PTS Blog Comment Policy.





Subscribe without commenting

PTS Waterfall Chart Utility PTS Cluster-Stack Column Chart Utility PTS Box and Whisker Chart Utility PTS Marimekko Chart Utility PTS Dot Plot Utility PTS Cascade Chart Utility

Create Excel dashboards quickly with Plug-N-Play reports.