<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Belated Review of Excel 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/</link>
	<description>Peltier Tech Excel Charts and Programming Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Get more Productivity than Excel 2003 Users with the Excel 2007 Features</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-22559</link>
		<dc:creator>Get more Productivity than Excel 2003 Users with the Excel 2007 Features</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=57#comment-22559</guid>
		<description>[...] Read: A Belated Review of Excel 2007 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read: A Belated Review of Excel 2007 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-21903</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=57#comment-21903</guid>
		<description>Paul -

Almost anything you can do in 2003 can also be done in 2007. It might take more swearing, but it usually can get done.

Make your chart with both series as lines. Right click one, choose Chart Type (2003) or Change Chart Type (2007), and change it to a bar. (Or start with both as bars and convert one to a line.) Right click one of the series, choose the Format item on the pop up menu, and change the axis to Secondary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul -</p>
<p>Almost anything you can do in 2003 can also be done in 2007. It might take more swearing, but it usually can get done.</p>
<p>Make your chart with both series as lines. Right click one, choose Chart Type (2003) or Change Chart Type (2007), and change it to a bar. (Or start with both as bars and convert one to a line.) Right click one of the series, choose the Format item on the pop up menu, and change the axis to Secondary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-21902</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=57#comment-21902</guid>
		<description>I used to be able to produce a chart with an X axis and two Y axis as in a climatogram. The x axis was months - time. One of the y axis was a bar graph, one a line graph. Can that be done with 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be able to produce a chart with an X axis and two Y axis as in a climatogram. The x axis was months &#8211; time. One of the y axis was a bar graph, one a line graph. Can that be done with 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-16520</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=57#comment-16520</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using spreadsheets for the better part of every day since Visicalc which I was happy to see replaced with Lotus 123.  I fondly remember changing those first 123 diskettes (three of them I believe) back and forth to use the different features of the program.  I was sorry to see Lotus 123 edged out by Excel which was an inferior spreadsheet at the time, but not being one to be stuck in the past I went along and made the best of it.  Eventually, Excel caught up to where Lotus had been years before and became a really good spread sheet (although Excel never could match the old Lotus /fc command).  All I have to say about Excel 2007 is &quot;it really sucks&quot;   What cumbesome piece of you-know-what this is--but is sure does look good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using spreadsheets for the better part of every day since Visicalc which I was happy to see replaced with Lotus 123.  I fondly remember changing those first 123 diskettes (three of them I believe) back and forth to use the different features of the program.  I was sorry to see Lotus 123 edged out by Excel which was an inferior spreadsheet at the time, but not being one to be stuck in the past I went along and made the best of it.  Eventually, Excel caught up to where Lotus had been years before and became a really good spread sheet (although Excel never could match the old Lotus /fc command).  All I have to say about Excel 2007 is &#8220;it really sucks&#8221;   What cumbesome piece of you-know-what this is&#8211;but is sure does look good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff weir</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-15928</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=57#comment-15928</guid>
		<description>Jon - a belated comment on your belated review regarding your comment ...&quot;Well, no problem, you may say, I’ll just customize the Ribbon, just like the toolbars in Excel 2003. But you would be mistaken. There is hardly any facility to modify the Ribbon via the user interface. There is a single one-row high strip along the title bar of the application window that you can customize....

My one-liner (which is rare for me) that summarises MS stupidity: if the QAT is all the chance the average user has got of customising the interface, then why the hell isn’t there an EXCEL OPTIONS button on the effing home tab?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon &#8211; a belated comment on your belated review regarding your comment &#8230;&#8221;Well, no problem, you may say, I’ll just customize the Ribbon, just like the toolbars in Excel 2003. But you would be mistaken. There is hardly any facility to modify the Ribbon via the user interface. There is a single one-row high strip along the title bar of the application window that you can customize&#8230;.</p>
<p>My one-liner (which is rare for me) that summarises MS stupidity: if the QAT is all the chance the average user has got of customising the interface, then why the hell isn’t there an EXCEL OPTIONS button on the effing home tab?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunt Blatz</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7586</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunt Blatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=57#comment-7586</guid>
		<description>You are quite right to keep Excel 2003 around.  I have been spending a great deal of time looking for features that were second nature  in 2003 and earlier.  I also find the lack of flexibility in the ribbon, and the amount of screen real estate it takes ignorant of Microsoft.  

For example, I have spent hours trying to make four simple adjustments to a stacked chart.  1. Add a title that was not there before.  2. Remove the word date from the first place on the X-axis (This version of Excel thinks that the word Date is a &quot;category&quot; and not a label). 3. Overlay a differently formatted time series using the same X-axis.  and 4. Adding some text boxes TO THE CHART explaining key points.

In 2003, this would take 10 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are quite right to keep Excel 2003 around.  I have been spending a great deal of time looking for features that were second nature  in 2003 and earlier.  I also find the lack of flexibility in the ribbon, and the amount of screen real estate it takes ignorant of Microsoft.  </p>
<p>For example, I have spent hours trying to make four simple adjustments to a stacked chart.  1. Add a title that was not there before.  2. Remove the word date from the first place on the X-axis (This version of Excel thinks that the word Date is a &#8220;category&#8221; and not a label). 3. Overlay a differently formatted time series using the same X-axis.  and 4. Adding some text boxes TO THE CHART explaining key points.</p>
<p>In 2003, this would take 10 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7070</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=57#comment-7070</guid>
		<description>Helen -

You will find A LOT of confusion about Excel 2007 compared to earlier versions. In many cases, people try something, it doesn&#039;t work, and WITHOUT TRYING IT IN EXCEL 2003, they state that some feature is no longer available. I have tried to test my assertions in both versions before making any bold claims; I have surprised myself with my own selective memory.

You can in fact select discontiguous ranges. I think Kevin has misunderstood how this works differently within the same Excel instance and across different applications. If you ctrl+click areas of cells that follow a rudimentary selection pattern (see below), then Excel will treat this discontiguous range as if it occupies the smaller condensed range. However, if your discontiguous selection does not follow the rules I&#039;ve spelled out, Excel will balk at most non-formatting operations regarding the selection. In addition, as soon as you try to use this discontiguous range outside of the Excel instance in which it was copied, the target application will treat the range as if it includes the unselected regions contained by the discontiguous areas.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules for &quot;well-formed&quot; discontiguous ranges:&lt;/strong&gt;
You must be able to remove unselected whole rows and columns from between selected areas, so that the selection condenses into a single highlighted rectangle;
no cells may be selected multiple times;
all boundaries between areas must extend continuously across the selection.&lt;/em&gt;

What is the Ctrl-Drag method you are speaking of? Do you mean Ctrl+Select (which works), or something different? You can Ctrl+Select to select usable discontiguous ranges. You can also use Ctrl+Drag to copy contiguous ranges to another location. Neither of these behaviors have changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helen -</p>
<p>You will find A LOT of confusion about Excel 2007 compared to earlier versions. In many cases, people try something, it doesn&#8217;t work, and WITHOUT TRYING IT IN EXCEL 2003, they state that some feature is no longer available. I have tried to test my assertions in both versions before making any bold claims; I have surprised myself with my own selective memory.</p>
<p>You can in fact select discontiguous ranges. I think Kevin has misunderstood how this works differently within the same Excel instance and across different applications. If you ctrl+click areas of cells that follow a rudimentary selection pattern (see below), then Excel will treat this discontiguous range as if it occupies the smaller condensed range. However, if your discontiguous selection does not follow the rules I&#8217;ve spelled out, Excel will balk at most non-formatting operations regarding the selection. In addition, as soon as you try to use this discontiguous range outside of the Excel instance in which it was copied, the target application will treat the range as if it includes the unselected regions contained by the discontiguous areas.</p>
<p><em><strong>Rules for &#8220;well-formed&#8221; discontiguous ranges:</strong><br />
You must be able to remove unselected whole rows and columns from between selected areas, so that the selection condenses into a single highlighted rectangle;<br />
no cells may be selected multiple times;<br />
all boundaries between areas must extend continuously across the selection.</em></p>
<p>What is the Ctrl-Drag method you are speaking of? Do you mean Ctrl+Select (which works), or something different? You can Ctrl+Select to select usable discontiguous ranges. You can also use Ctrl+Drag to copy contiguous ranges to another location. Neither of these behaviors have changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Smith</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7068</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=57#comment-7068</guid>
		<description>If you can&#039;t select a discontiguous range of cells, this means that you can&#039;t plot them in a chart - which seems to me to be disastrous! Have I really understood this correctly? 

I have compared the behaviour of Excel 2003 and 2007 and find that the Ctrl-drag method which works in 2003 doesn&#039;t work in 2007, as Kevin Lade says. Is there really no way round this?

Helen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can&#8217;t select a discontiguous range of cells, this means that you can&#8217;t plot them in a chart &#8211; which seems to me to be disastrous! Have I really understood this correctly? </p>
<p>I have compared the behaviour of Excel 2003 and 2007 and find that the Ctrl-drag method which works in 2003 doesn&#8217;t work in 2007, as Kevin Lade says. Is there really no way round this?</p>
<p>Helen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-4813</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=57#comment-4813</guid>
		<description>Kevin -

If you copy the discontiguous cells, and paste them within the same Excel instance, only the selected cells are pasted. If you paste them elsewhere, the entire range is pasted. This behavior is unchanged from earlier versions of Excel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin -</p>
<p>If you copy the discontiguous cells, and paste them within the same Excel instance, only the selected cells are pasted. If you paste them elsewhere, the entire range is pasted. This behavior is unchanged from earlier versions of Excel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Lade</title>
		<link>http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/a-belated-review-of-excel-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-4809</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Lade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peltiertech.com/WordPress/?p=57#comment-4809</guid>
		<description>I like the new version.  Except, there is no way to select noncontiguous cells.  The use of ctrl+click does not work as described in the Help menu.  When multiple cells in a column are selected, and I choose the Copy command, all cells between the first and last are placed on the clipboard (like what the Shift key is intended to do).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new version.  Except, there is no way to select noncontiguous cells.  The use of ctrl+click does not work as described in the Help menu.  When multiple cells in a column are selected, and I choose the Copy command, all cells between the first and last are placed on the clipboard (like what the Shift key is intended to do).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
