|
Excel Dashboards
Books at Amazon.com |
Charting Per Capita Earmarks
I've prepared this page as part of my response to the Mid-week entertainment: spots blog entry in Kaiser's fine Junk Charts blog. I actually saw the chart in question first in the Worse than a Pie Chart? entry in Andrew Gelman's Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science blog. The original chart was produced by the IBM Collaborative User Experience Research Group and archived on their Many Eyes web site.
Below are two charts showing per capita federal spending by state, ranked in decreasing order of spending. The bar chart seems more effective to me than the line chart; in any case line charts should be used with caution when the X axis is purely categorical. Alaska is the king of federal spending, due in part I suppose to research on harnessing the electrical power of the aurora borealis and building interstate bridges to sparsely populated islands. Another group of states, Hawaii, West Virginia, Alabama, Vermont, and Montana, show per capita funding somewhat elevated from that of the rest of the states. California is an unremarkable 34th in the list, squeezed between Arizona and Tennessee. Both of these charts suffer from having labels rotated 90° from the optimum reading angle. The numerical data labels aren't strictly necessary, but the state axis labels certainly are.
To alleviate neck strain and to make labels easier to read, I've rotated the line and column charts above into the dot and bar charts below. Even on a log scale (below right), Alaska stands out. Any of these charts meet my initial objectives. The relative spending can be readily compared, and the patterns (one large state, Alaska, followed by a group of five, followed by all the rest) are clear in all three.
Of course, the analysis is incomplete. A view of tax revenues, both absolute and per capita, would add context to the chart. So would an indication of GNP for each state (which Kaiser also mentioned). A breakdown of type of expenditure (transportation, education, R&D, military) would also help to explain some of the variation. |
Peltier Technical Services, Inc.Excel Chart Add-Ins | Training | Charts and Tutorials | PTS BlogPeltier Technical Services, Inc., Copyright © 2013. All rights reserved. |